“Passion is the emotional fuel that drives your vision. It’s what you hold onto when your ideas are challenged and people turn you down, when you are rejected by ‘experts’ and the people closest to you. It’s the fuel that keeps you going when there is no outside validation for your dream.”
“Passion won’t protect you against setbacks, but it will insure that no failure is ever final.”
"Passion is meaningless without vision. A vision is how you will make the world a better place."
"Epiphanies rarely occur in familiar surroundings. The key to “thinking differently” is to perceive things differently, through the lenses of a trailblazer. And to see things through these lenses, you must force your brain to make connections it otherwise would have missed."
"Spend fifteen minutes a day asking questions that challenge the status quo. Instead of asking “how?” use questions that begin with “why?” and “what if?”
Who said ALL these things?
-- Steve Jobs, an Idealist who embodied Passion and changed the world!
Steve Jobs, I have him as:
6th Level Mature Scholar,
Goal of Discrimination
Aggression Mode
Attitude of Idealist
Instinctive Center
Primary Chief Feature of Stubborness
Now those are some decent Overleaves, not like the 'train-wreck' that was chosen for me.
My Overleaves, as channeled by Ted Fontaine, Sat. Aug 6th, 1994, 11:27pm EDT, Niles, CA
(check out the horary Astro. chart for the time, I will post later)
MICHAEL ENTITY: You are Sage, 7th Level Mature with a Priest Essence Twin. You feel like Goal of Growth and Passion Mode. Attitude of a Spritualist with an affection for Cynic which you like to slide to at times. Chief Feature Of Self Destruction, secondary of Stubborness. Body type isn't real clear, you look like Saturn with Jovial (could be sage), Mercury and some Lunar.
You like to have fun*, more so than many of us more staid types who are more willing to put their nose to the grindstone. You like having lots of people around because it seems like you enjoy creating characters for others to respond to. Laughter is the magic for you as well as connecting to your guides who are more than the angelic realm^. Consider that the angelic realm uses a universal language that is translatable - or must be translated by those of us who channel. Here is where the work is, in listening and translating. Te easy part for you is over. Spiritualists are naturals at channeling but are less willing to put in the difficult work of discernment. We are not here criticizing your work. You do Good Work in bringing in the angelic work and creating a story in which listeners can look for greater meanings. Angelic realms do have pulls against each other to aid in the creation process - one of which is the transformation of the planet.
Detoxifying yourself is a way for you to begin to clear out much of the unwanted information that, being conscious information, enjoys using you because of your ability, as a Sage, to put together these stories. What you will not like is the confinement that the detoxification process will give you. Being in Growth you need to slide to Re-evaluation for a while and get recentered.
One thing the angels are up to is clearing the way for the energy transformation that will begin around September (more fully, it has been going on since 1988). You are being called into re-evaluation at this time to brace yourself for the upcoming roller-coaster ride which will begin for you in November. You are going to question your reality and wonder about whether or not you can pull away all the films that seem to be covering the layers of reality beneath this one. You need to get the old junk out of your life and your recent divorce after many years of marriage, and your ongoing detoxification are really just drastic measures for your transformation to begin. This is a year for clearing away old junk anyway, good timing.
Sages love fun more than any other role. Fun is not your downfall, but your way. You have been taught that it is not a worthy condition. Throw that away. Fun brings people to the Buddha**, when they are centered. Your way is worthy. The paradox is that fun is nt necessarily an easy way. We hope we have been able to encourage you. Pay attention to the way you feel. Use time to explore chronic pain in a neutral, non-attached way.
Namaste - MICHAEL, 4th Level of the Causal Plane.
*I believe the word 'fun' here and throughout refers in part to drug use.
^I believe the Akashic is the basic 'realm' here referred to.
** Vajrayana Rajah Tantra has a 4,000 year honored tradition of drug use in Yogic practice.
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Refute My Data Because I'm An Ass? I Don't Think So
"Surender(sic)" is NOT POSSIBLE, especially to any forces who CANNOT EVEN SPELL THE WORD!!!!!!
The Lesson (over & over) AS NO MT Student Seems Able To Cope With Passion Mode Without Disparagement Or Condemnation!
Posted by Jondalf Thrasher on April 24, 2012 at 5:11amView Blog
The True:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
"Passion: Physical and emotional imbalance. Physical and emotional healing. The fourth chakra.
Imbalance:
The negative pole of Passion is Identification, a loss of space or boundary between you and something else (ALSO THE TIME-HONORED METHODOLOGY FOR ADEPTS IN RAJVAYANA RAJAH YOGA - AKA: DIETY YOGA - J).
When you are identified, you feel the same emotions as those you are watching or listening to (also called: Empathy - J) You become attached to whom or whatever is the object of your Passion (not the case with me - J).
Here, (in the negative pole as described by the Michael) fourth chakra and second chakra are open, and the discrimination of the fifth chakra is underused or not functioning. (In Diety Yoga, the fifth chakra is utilized to reinforce the notion that Aspirant and Subject of Aspiration are one, see below. -J).
Healing:
Self-actualization is the positive pole of Passion Mode. The ability to throw oneself fully into something so completely that you become one with it. Here the fourth chakra is open, but balanced by the discriminating fifth and the dynamism of the second.
The way to identify whether one is in Identification or Self-Actualization is to "Ask yourself what you are attached to. If you are attached to a person or a thing you are probably Identified. If you simply want the experience you are headed for self-actualization." - Jose Stevens, "Earth To Tao".
Recently, my Passion Mode manifested in a reply to another Michael Student (see below). Even though I personally did not feel as though I had directed any discourtesy or rancor towards the other student, knowing the inability of most MT students to NOT NOT take personally my rhetoric when in Passion Mode, I apologised in case they had taken it that way, and in that interpretation thereby, I had given offense. (Read the text for yourself and decide. My apology was accepted (or so I was told) and I thought that that.
However, the individual involved then posted a derogatory assessment (prompted, I am told, by influence from members of another site with incentive to attempt to disparage members of this site at every opportunity).
The irony of accepting an apology for supposed discourtesy, only to turn aroun and berate members for said discourtesy is so blatant one wonders if there is some overwhelming influence that would provoke this kind of offensive two-facedness.
In the future, I will no longer attempt to do the right thing, and bend over backwards to apologise for things I think need no apology, solely to display courtesy, because obviously it will not be appreciated. FTITCTAJ, then.
Supposed "offensive" post follows:
All that having been said, your "Assumption Of Benificence" on the part of Essence, and/or the Universe will just NOT stand up to the kind of rigorous "WORK" the ME is now demanding. The days of the 'hippy-dippy' Spiritual Intuitive are behind us, my friend:
The Michael: ". . . we add here that your logic is another tool but can be extended to realities outside the physical plane. Logic is Universal to all planes and All That Is. LOGIC (NOT INTUITION, THEY SAY! - J) IS THE MEANS TO ARRIVE AT A TRUTH!" - T Fontaine
"It's hard for people to be spiritual who are hungry. It's difficult to talk about Spirit to an empty belly - just irrelevant. You have to feed them something . . . and create the conditions where Spirit can grow and flourish. . . Being enlightened is taking conscious part in helping God (I say 'Tao" - J) with his Universe, saying "Well, I'd better do what I can to try and make things stretch. It seems like some folks are having trouble making things stretch." If you really understand the situation, you'd like to help. . . . Everyone should be figuring out what they can really do; what they can REALLY handle. We have so much to do; we need so much help and so much cooperation and so many people to step out and take responsibility . . . TO STEP OUT INTO IT" - S. Gaskin
Lastly, my brother, if you really believe that "divination is just getting in touch with Essence", you REALLY NEED to study this (the whole site, not just the quote) otherwise you're a danger to yourself and others, all intuitive 'goodvibes' notwithstanding.
This site PROVES, with irrefutable LOGIC, where you, and many on TLE are simply DELUDED, SORRY, NO KINDER WAY TO SAY IT. YOU HAVE NOT DILIGENTLY RESEARCHED THE TEACHINGS OR THE LOGIC OF THE PHYSICS AND MATH OF THE SITUATION. THE DAYS OF 'FEELING' YOUR WAY TO THE 'TRUTH' ARE OVER, THINGS HAVE CHANGED, SUCK IT UP, PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT THE ME IS SAYING THROUGH COUNTLESS, UNDENIABLY UNBIASED SOURCES, OR BE LEFT BEHIND IN ILLUSION. THE CHOICE IS YOURS - YOU CHOOSE. Jondalf
"Q24 Does many-worlds allow free-will?
Many-Worlds, whilst deterministic on the objective universal level, is indeterministic on the subjective level so the situation is certainly no better or worse for free-will than in the Copenhagen view. Traditional Copenhagen indeterministic quantum mechanics only slightly weakens the case for free-will. In quantum terms each neuron is an essentially classical object. Consequently quantum noise in the brain is at such a low level that it probably doesn't often alter, except very rarely, the critical mechanistic behaviour of sufficient neurons to cause a decision to be different than we might otherwise expect. The consensus view amongst experts is that free-will is the consequence of the mechanistic operation of our brains, the firing of neurons, discharging across synapses etc. and fully compatible with the determinism of classical physics. Free-will is the inability of an intelligent, self-aware mechanism to predict its own future actions due to the logical impossibility of any mechanism containing a complete internal model of itself rather than any inherent indeterminism in the mechanism's operation.
Nevertheless, some people find that with all possible decisions being realised in different worlds that the prima face situation for free- will looks quite difficult. Does this multiplicity of outcomes destroy free-will? If both sides of a choice are selected in different worlds why bother to spend time weighing the evidence before selecting? The answer is that whilst all decisions are realised, some are realised more often than others - or to put to more precisely each branch of a decision has its own weighting or measure which enforces the usual laws of quantum statistics.
This measure is supplied by the mathematical structure of the Hilbert spaces. Every Hilbert space has a norm, constructed from the inner product, - which we can think of as analogous to a volume - which weights each world or collection of worlds. A world of zero volume is never realised. Worlds in which the conventional statistical predictions consistently break down have zero volume and so are never realised. (See "How do probabilities emerge within many-worlds?")
Thus our actions, as expressions of our will, correlate with the weights associated with worlds. This, of course, matches our subjective experience of being able to exercise our will, form moral judgements and be held responsible for our actions."
I believe the explanation proves that the assertion "divination is simply getting in touch with Essence" is, indeed, a delusion. The assertions also to the effect that no-one affects the nature of reality and/or the shape of the future by channeling information, is also thereby shown to be delusional. Seems like anyone believing so, never heard of a guy named Heisenberg.
Harsh, perhaps. Discourteous, unbalanced or uncentered? In what fantasy universe? Bereft of facts, or logic, I guess all one can do is whine about how sombody else is "unbalanced" or "unstable". PERISH THE THOUGHT ANYONE MIGHT ACTUALLY ADDRESS THE POINT THAT IN LIGHT OF CUTTING EDGE PHYSICS, SOME STUDENT STATEMENTS HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE FALSE. OH NO, NEVER ANY DISCUSSION OF THE MERITS OF THE ARGUMENTS, ONLY, AT THE FIRST HINT OF REFUTATION BY LOGIC, AS USUAL, COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE PERSON PRESENTING THE ARGUMENT - DOES NO-ONE ELSE REALIZE WHAT 15th CENTURY INTELLECTUAL MADNESS THIS IS:
OH NO, NO MATTER HOW LOGICAL, OR BACKED BY WHAT PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE AN ARGUMENT/STATEMENT/ASSERTION IS, IF I DON'T "FEEL" THE PERSON PRESENTING IT IS ACTING FROM WHAT I CALL "LOVE", OR "COURTESY", OR "BALANCE", I AM JUSTIFIED IN IGNORING EVERYTHING THAT PROVES ME WRONG, BECAUSE I DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO ANYONE I DON'T "FEEL" IS "CENTERED" ! WHAT TOTAL BULLSHIT! IT'S CALLED: SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS.
NO RATIONAL PERSON CAN DISMISS DATA BECAUSE THEY DON'T LIKE THE ATTITUDE WITH WHICH IT IS DELIVERED!
THIS IS AN ACCEPTABLE ATTITUDE ONLY IN PLACES LIKE IRAN, WHERE PERSONAL RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY IS ALLOWED TO PASS FOR RATIONAL THOUGHT, NOT IN THE MODERN WORLD OF EMPIRICISM AND CRITICAL THINKING.
ANYONE WANT TO PASS JUDGEMENT ON WHAT I SAY, BECAUSE OF WHO I AM, MOVE TO IRAN, YOU'LL BE RIGHT AT HOME THERE! - Jondalf Thrasher
The Lesson (over & over) AS NO MT Student Seems Able To Cope With Passion Mode Without Disparagement Or Condemnation!
Posted by Jondalf Thrasher on April 24, 2012 at 5:11amView Blog
The True:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
"Passion: Physical and emotional imbalance. Physical and emotional healing. The fourth chakra.
Imbalance:
The negative pole of Passion is Identification, a loss of space or boundary between you and something else (ALSO THE TIME-HONORED METHODOLOGY FOR ADEPTS IN RAJVAYANA RAJAH YOGA - AKA: DIETY YOGA - J).
When you are identified, you feel the same emotions as those you are watching or listening to (also called: Empathy - J) You become attached to whom or whatever is the object of your Passion (not the case with me - J).
Here, (in the negative pole as described by the Michael) fourth chakra and second chakra are open, and the discrimination of the fifth chakra is underused or not functioning. (In Diety Yoga, the fifth chakra is utilized to reinforce the notion that Aspirant and Subject of Aspiration are one, see below. -J).
Healing:
Self-actualization is the positive pole of Passion Mode. The ability to throw oneself fully into something so completely that you become one with it. Here the fourth chakra is open, but balanced by the discriminating fifth and the dynamism of the second.
The way to identify whether one is in Identification or Self-Actualization is to "Ask yourself what you are attached to. If you are attached to a person or a thing you are probably Identified. If you simply want the experience you are headed for self-actualization." - Jose Stevens, "Earth To Tao".
Recently, my Passion Mode manifested in a reply to another Michael Student (see below). Even though I personally did not feel as though I had directed any discourtesy or rancor towards the other student, knowing the inability of most MT students to NOT NOT take personally my rhetoric when in Passion Mode, I apologised in case they had taken it that way, and in that interpretation thereby, I had given offense. (Read the text for yourself and decide. My apology was accepted (or so I was told) and I thought that that.
However, the individual involved then posted a derogatory assessment (prompted, I am told, by influence from members of another site with incentive to attempt to disparage members of this site at every opportunity).
The irony of accepting an apology for supposed discourtesy, only to turn aroun and berate members for said discourtesy is so blatant one wonders if there is some overwhelming influence that would provoke this kind of offensive two-facedness.
In the future, I will no longer attempt to do the right thing, and bend over backwards to apologise for things I think need no apology, solely to display courtesy, because obviously it will not be appreciated. FTITCTAJ, then.
Supposed "offensive" post follows:
All that having been said, your "Assumption Of Benificence" on the part of Essence, and/or the Universe will just NOT stand up to the kind of rigorous "WORK" the ME is now demanding. The days of the 'hippy-dippy' Spiritual Intuitive are behind us, my friend:
The Michael: ". . . we add here that your logic is another tool but can be extended to realities outside the physical plane. Logic is Universal to all planes and All That Is. LOGIC (NOT INTUITION, THEY SAY! - J) IS THE MEANS TO ARRIVE AT A TRUTH!" - T Fontaine
"It's hard for people to be spiritual who are hungry. It's difficult to talk about Spirit to an empty belly - just irrelevant. You have to feed them something . . . and create the conditions where Spirit can grow and flourish. . . Being enlightened is taking conscious part in helping God (I say 'Tao" - J) with his Universe, saying "Well, I'd better do what I can to try and make things stretch. It seems like some folks are having trouble making things stretch." If you really understand the situation, you'd like to help. . . . Everyone should be figuring out what they can really do; what they can REALLY handle. We have so much to do; we need so much help and so much cooperation and so many people to step out and take responsibility . . . TO STEP OUT INTO IT" - S. Gaskin
Lastly, my brother, if you really believe that "divination is just getting in touch with Essence", you REALLY NEED to study this (the whole site, not just the quote) otherwise you're a danger to yourself and others, all intuitive 'goodvibes' notwithstanding.
This site PROVES, with irrefutable LOGIC, where you, and many on TLE are simply DELUDED, SORRY, NO KINDER WAY TO SAY IT. YOU HAVE NOT DILIGENTLY RESEARCHED THE TEACHINGS OR THE LOGIC OF THE PHYSICS AND MATH OF THE SITUATION. THE DAYS OF 'FEELING' YOUR WAY TO THE 'TRUTH' ARE OVER, THINGS HAVE CHANGED, SUCK IT UP, PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT THE ME IS SAYING THROUGH COUNTLESS, UNDENIABLY UNBIASED SOURCES, OR BE LEFT BEHIND IN ILLUSION. THE CHOICE IS YOURS - YOU CHOOSE. Jondalf
"Q24 Does many-worlds allow free-will?
Many-Worlds, whilst deterministic on the objective universal level, is indeterministic on the subjective level so the situation is certainly no better or worse for free-will than in the Copenhagen view. Traditional Copenhagen indeterministic quantum mechanics only slightly weakens the case for free-will. In quantum terms each neuron is an essentially classical object. Consequently quantum noise in the brain is at such a low level that it probably doesn't often alter, except very rarely, the critical mechanistic behaviour of sufficient neurons to cause a decision to be different than we might otherwise expect. The consensus view amongst experts is that free-will is the consequence of the mechanistic operation of our brains, the firing of neurons, discharging across synapses etc. and fully compatible with the determinism of classical physics. Free-will is the inability of an intelligent, self-aware mechanism to predict its own future actions due to the logical impossibility of any mechanism containing a complete internal model of itself rather than any inherent indeterminism in the mechanism's operation.
Nevertheless, some people find that with all possible decisions being realised in different worlds that the prima face situation for free- will looks quite difficult. Does this multiplicity of outcomes destroy free-will? If both sides of a choice are selected in different worlds why bother to spend time weighing the evidence before selecting? The answer is that whilst all decisions are realised, some are realised more often than others - or to put to more precisely each branch of a decision has its own weighting or measure which enforces the usual laws of quantum statistics.
This measure is supplied by the mathematical structure of the Hilbert spaces. Every Hilbert space has a norm, constructed from the inner product, - which we can think of as analogous to a volume - which weights each world or collection of worlds. A world of zero volume is never realised. Worlds in which the conventional statistical predictions consistently break down have zero volume and so are never realised. (See "How do probabilities emerge within many-worlds?")
Thus our actions, as expressions of our will, correlate with the weights associated with worlds. This, of course, matches our subjective experience of being able to exercise our will, form moral judgements and be held responsible for our actions."
I believe the explanation proves that the assertion "divination is simply getting in touch with Essence" is, indeed, a delusion. The assertions also to the effect that no-one affects the nature of reality and/or the shape of the future by channeling information, is also thereby shown to be delusional. Seems like anyone believing so, never heard of a guy named Heisenberg.
Harsh, perhaps. Discourteous, unbalanced or uncentered? In what fantasy universe? Bereft of facts, or logic, I guess all one can do is whine about how sombody else is "unbalanced" or "unstable". PERISH THE THOUGHT ANYONE MIGHT ACTUALLY ADDRESS THE POINT THAT IN LIGHT OF CUTTING EDGE PHYSICS, SOME STUDENT STATEMENTS HAVE BEEN SHOWN TO BE FALSE. OH NO, NEVER ANY DISCUSSION OF THE MERITS OF THE ARGUMENTS, ONLY, AT THE FIRST HINT OF REFUTATION BY LOGIC, AS USUAL, COMPLAINTS ABOUT THE PERSON PRESENTING THE ARGUMENT - DOES NO-ONE ELSE REALIZE WHAT 15th CENTURY INTELLECTUAL MADNESS THIS IS:
OH NO, NO MATTER HOW LOGICAL, OR BACKED BY WHAT PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE AN ARGUMENT/STATEMENT/ASSERTION IS, IF I DON'T "FEEL" THE PERSON PRESENTING IT IS ACTING FROM WHAT I CALL "LOVE", OR "COURTESY", OR "BALANCE", I AM JUSTIFIED IN IGNORING EVERYTHING THAT PROVES ME WRONG, BECAUSE I DON'T PAY ATTENTION TO ANYONE I DON'T "FEEL" IS "CENTERED" ! WHAT TOTAL BULLSHIT! IT'S CALLED: SELF-RIGHTEOUSNESS.
NO RATIONAL PERSON CAN DISMISS DATA BECAUSE THEY DON'T LIKE THE ATTITUDE WITH WHICH IT IS DELIVERED!
THIS IS AN ACCEPTABLE ATTITUDE ONLY IN PLACES LIKE IRAN, WHERE PERSONAL RELIGIOUS BIGOTRY IS ALLOWED TO PASS FOR RATIONAL THOUGHT, NOT IN THE MODERN WORLD OF EMPIRICISM AND CRITICAL THINKING.
ANYONE WANT TO PASS JUDGEMENT ON WHAT I SAY, BECAUSE OF WHO I AM, MOVE TO IRAN, YOU'LL BE RIGHT AT HOME THERE! - Jondalf Thrasher
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)