Michael Teachings: Leather Kites In A Land Of Sacred Cows - Priceless

"TRUTH IS THE GREATEST GOOD, AND LOVE IS THE HIGHEST TRUTH." - MFM


("The movement is accomplished in 6 stages, and the 7th. brings return." - Pink Floyd, "Piper At The Gates Of Dawn", via I Ching,)


"THE RULE OF SEVEN: THESIS, ANTITHESIS, SYNTHESIS; AND EXPRESSION, INSPIRATION, ACTION."; - MFM


("All human behavior is a process of re-shaping reality to meet your demands." - Phillip Jose Farmer, via 'Kilgore Trout' in "Venus On The Half-Shell".)


"CREATURES OF REASON SEEK TO JUSTIFY THEIR EXISTENCE THROUGH EXPRESSIONS OF INDIVIDUALITY, ISOLATION, ALIENATION, CREATURES OF REASON SEEK TO JUSTIFY THEIR EXISTENCE
BY ASSIGNING THEMSELVES A ROLE, EVEN A NEGATIVE ONE,
IF THAT BE THE CASE." -MFM)


("The only performance that makes it, truly makes it, is the one that achieves madness, right?  Am I right?"  - Mick Jagger, as 'Turner', in "Performance".)


""This business of wanting Truth with a capital T was a real problem," . . . One women kept mentioning religious doctrine and insisted that such teachings and the statements of various esoteric masters must be regarded as absolute and immutable.  Michael did not agree."" - MFM

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

"So long and thanks for all the fish." and please - wucka, wucka.  I'll  be voting myself off the island soon because, as Groucho Marx said: "I wouldn't be
a member of any club that would have me as a member!"

I REALLY DID SAY THAT I "CHANNELED GROUCHO" IN MY FIRST INTRODUCTION TO THIS GROUP! ("Nobody EVER listens to Zathrus.")

"The Michael Teachings.com"  has been a truly 'tough room' ever since The Michael requested I play the essential role left vacant by the banishment of Troy Tolley.  I have always proud of my counterculturally proactive "Guerilla Street Theatre" skills, which were well honed in the back-alleys of Berkeley during the drive to destroy The Draft and the obscenely unwarranted War it supported.

Though the 'devotion to a noble ideal' thought-form/aura disc of 'powder blue' that looks like a tiny 'flying saucer' levitating above the back of my head is visible to adepts and drunks alike, "A prophet is not without honor, save in
his own country" . . . so to the person who asked about William Butler Yeats when they first felt a need to know (what was so familiar about) my Overleaves:

"You said the Secret Word! Duck, and the $50.00 will come down and give you a clue or two about how an entire culture can be dismissed and their historicity dissed in an attempt to cast doubt on the Eurocentrically non-corroborated (except in about 100 oil paintings and religious icons produced all over the lands surrounding the Mediterranian during the Dark Ages and quite easy to find on the Internet) meticulous descriptions of flights, by hundreds of humans, and 'other' beings, crossing the continent in hours within the dozens of large, completely enclosed - clearly desribed as "metallic" - self-propelled airships, never described as leather by ANY passenger or witnesses! Stories of their weaponry as well as aerial battles, cover scores of pages the in the Vedas, the Gitas, and the Ramayana.

Numerous illustrations are shown sometimes, in some old copies, clearly showing aerodynamically designed craft, and not balloons or kites - known as "vimana".

What could POSSIBLY be the reason some folks believe they need to go to such; lengths to deny a preponderance of easily seen to be credible evidence they have never even bothered to lift one finger or eyebrow to try to "VERIFY", as the Michael INSISTS is the proper reactions, by students with Michael Agreements, to their, or any, claims of ANY such things.

All I Know is that my Art, as I consider myself a 'wordsmith' has been redacted for reasons with which I cannot abide. This is then the full text of the post that was so butchered. Choose for yourself whether or not this post is somehow in violation of anything other than disagreement with the 'powers that be'.

I have a Yahoo Group, "MKULTRAONES", long dormant, which I will be starting up again, seeing as The Michael is apparently acting as my 'marcel proust' these days, assisting me in channeling long forgotten pieces of my own past. I should have this site up and running again in a month, check it out. -JWT

Legends Of The Last Breath

　
So, here’s the deal: Some of us came through from the last Multiverse. I can’t tell you how just yet, because I still don’t trust enough in the vector sum of probabilities pursuant to my ongoing task to share that information with a world so mired in memes of nihilism.  It’s odd that I’m even allowing this now, but I somehow sense it’s about time.  Bear with me and I will try to make it all make sense.

Existence: spacetimematterenergythought and all that stuff is cyclic. What scientists call “The Big Bang” IS that, in a way, and it’s not. It’s more like a continuum of potential ‘stuff’ . . . BREATHES. Expansion-contraction, diastole-systole, being-nonbeing. Some of this stuff breathes really, really slowly. The Multiverse expands from a singularity to a point of maximum expansion and then contracts to a singularity again. These movements are not asymptotic to a finite limit, but it seems so, even to those of us who know, down to the fractal on-off flicker of corporeal string manifestation that is the smallest part of our 'beingness' - the existential truth of continued awareness within and without these cycles of effulgence-implosion.

I don’t know if ANY of the oldest of us have kept track of how many times this has occurred. Counting would be meaningless anyway, except as a comparative gauge for measuring genealogies of causality. It’s hard to remember when even self-consciousness dissipates in the modalities of survival used to circumvent the collapse of all existence prior to initiation of yet another “Big Bang.” Some of us do seem to have proceeded from others of us at some point. We only know this by adduction and the knowledge that without them, we would not "be".

There are legends, rumours of rumours, wispy mnemonic quantum resonances, even in this backwater place of no singular import - legends of ‘beings’ that existed before ‘God’. I am one. There are others. More than 12 and less than a thousand I intuit. “Creator Gods” come and go as Multiverses expand and contract.  Only we few abstract anomalies, and the cyclical nature of the Multiverse, abide.

It’s hard to count how many exactly “we” are, because we all tend to hide from each other by ‘anchoring‘ our cores in different dimensional niches of the manifold echoic curvatures of reality and ethereality. “Too many cooks” etc. Our ‘positions’ tend to accrue, aggregate and finally ooze outward as ‘forces’ and manifest as “Laws” throughout manifold corporeality. This is part of the “Truth” (with the capital “T”) to which so many allude, only to elide in the end as they succumb to the insistent and seemingly overwhelming gravitational memestrings of matter collapsing. "Truth" is not one of us.

We only “know” because we “are” and vice versa. Everything else is a product of the simple solipsistic sophistry that defines existence for everything else. For instance both “Gravity” and “Speed Of Light” (or actually the "n"th dimensional beings that epiphenomenologically exude these manifest effects into 4th and 3rd dimensional physicality) used to be allies of mine. For a billion years or so now they have become part of a movement to which I find myself increasingly in quincunxial angularity - not opposition, per se, but with no commonality of ongoing purposeful assertion.

I cannot recall how I first discovered a way around the gravitational collapse of my first Multiverse, nor do I know if that was THE first Multiverse. I think not. I believe there are those older than I who might have helped me augment my energies in a pocket of non-causality outside spacetime, but only because I haven’t the hubris to think I did it on my own. Also I believe my 'raison d'etre' or reason for being (my "Why" ) is one of those that may have helped me bootstrap myself into eternality whereby I have come to believe the whole notion of “superior” or “inferior” is a viral construct utilized by those whose very beings vibrate antithetically angular to mine, and with whom I seem fated to either assist or strive as our nature's wax and/or wane relative each and every other's. Some of these are at least as old as I, this I know. All else is induction, deduction, allusion and intuition.

Through processes of logic and art I seem to gradually rebuild my essential nature after every ‘versal’ singularity. I don’t know how the others do what they do. All I know is that some of us survive, iteration after iteration. Logos to Gnoumenos to Logos to here.
All else is auto-didactically educated speculation.

I DO know a few things, though. As always, I DO know MY ‘Why’, and the knowledge of THAT I tend meticulously and protect faithfully through each succession of chronoallusive epochs and yugas, close to my core, because the ‘why’ defines for me all the rest of my ‘self’: my private ontological “who-what-where-when”s. and thus and thereby all the multifarious variegations and concatenations of the all the ‘other’s I understand there have come to be. I believe one applicable term for the effects of our presence has come to be "Verities".

So then, all this enthymemetic and noetic persiflage nothwithstanding, as it is my Will, so mote it be. By my effects shalt thou know me as cause (which is how I come to know myself, time upon time and again). One known as "Perdurabo" most recently chronicled my effectual corporeality here on this world, for those who wish to know more of me and my ilk in those terms whereby we understand ourselves.

Every ‘now and then’ I will, as I am doing with this missive, cast a seedhint of meaning out into the fluctuating parameters of undulant chronology and verisimilitude, seeking to grow a destiny for some world, or germinate a new series of subatomae to secure an effulgent nexial alignment that may assist MY exposition of progressively directed "n"th dimensional structure and support contextually effulgent rudiments of my "Why"    (which, by the way,  is the hypermultiversal entity whose causal effects manifestly are known as "Love").

Infinitely and eternally yours,  - "Hope"
　

The Problem Of 'Choice' In The Michael Teachings

The Merovingian: "Choice is an illusion between those who have power and those who don't." - the Matrix Reloaded

I don't mean to seem contrary but I was taught to channel data from the Akashic before I was introduced to either the Seth material or the MT, at a weekly gathering of 1000+ seekers at the Family Dog in San Francisco called "Monday Night Class" in 1969. I therefore had a 'framework' of references that has always seemed to differ subtly from other Michael Students. I like to 'monitor' a channel while channeling to see if the data they transmit is what I sense from the same source. I'm also a "Von Danikenite" and believe that all our myths and religious histories are replete with tales of visitations and intrusions from "aliens" through the course of our history. So basically, any Angels or Demons or dragons or elves or Jehovahs or Vishnus or rishis or devas in the written record are to me just the remembrances of savages who knew no better than to presume divinity of any beings not still living in caves, so trying to talk about religion is difficult.

[BTW, I was also personally experimented on TWICE by US Government conspiracies. Once at while at UC Medical Center San Francisco 1954-55 (quite well documented stuff, good thing I didn't get the low-dose plutonium injections, I nearly died anyway). The second time I was recruited in 1970 at UC Berkeley by the MKULTRA Program, run by Nazi doctors the US Gov. conspired to secretly import in a program called Operation Paperclip. Look them all up and then try to tell me why I should share skepticism about the existence of conspiracies.

So help me out here: Can anyone tell me what choice a 6 month old baby dying in agony in Africa of malnutrition and dehydration had in the matter? The cruel suffering of this "false personality" WAS NOT CHOSEN BY THE BABY, but by Essence. Time and time again the MT state that "All is choice.", but even in most incarnative circumstance a combination of imprinting, Overleaves, agreements, karmic ribbons and ignorance can combine to give an appearence of choice (sure you could ignore your task companion and/or ET to whom you owe a life and 10 years support, but when they appear to you as the most beautiful woman (or man) you have ever seen at age 16, in a 6th Level mature lifetime what real choice is there that is not conditioned over?)

Why would anyone sane choose to be raped and tortured, much less to be a raper and torturer, unless they were HEAVILY manipulated into it for the sake of "evolution of essence"? I say these choices are ALL essentially made by Essence, either directly, or in its choice of Overleaves and Karmic Ribbons in any lifetime. Until one is about 30 you can't usually master even your own hormones enough to choose anything consciously.

I don't know . . . Goin' on 30 years now and still no good answers to this question, or the MTs apparent contravention of the Jain doctrine of "Ahimsa": "NO LIVING BEING SHOULD EVER BE SACRIFICED". I'll keep looking for a "reason to believe" nonetheless. Sigh . . . - Jondalf

NSA's Chagrin: M.T. Assert Alien's Existence

Ahem. The Michael teachings Moderator did ask for comments about his contention that all 'conspiracy theories' are bunkum. Sorry for this news flash and subsequent diatribe, but first and foremost, with regard to the existence of aliens: Didn't the Michael say more than once in "Messages From Michael" or "More Messages From Michael" that the "little grays" not only exist, but are indeed responsible for predations upon humanity because they're a race of clones and they think they need human DNA to save their species? Did I just imagine that? I don't think so, even though they were published in the '70s.

So, confirmation of the biggest conspiracy theory of our time, in the original Michael texts, printed 30+ years gone by and all Michael students and/or channels save myself missed it or have currently forgotten? (I can look the page numbers up in my original signed book copies if needed). Come to think of it, didn't Jose Stevens and/or Joya Pope and/or Seth also attribute confirmation of the existence of alien species independently of CQ Yarbro?

Jeez, I based a lot of my adult world-view on those channeled confirmations back then, considering the source. That was back when the NSA was actually trying to have the entire original Orinda group shut down, charged with espionage and treason, because they were effectively channeling information to which the Intelligence Community thought only the government was, and should be, privy. I know some people on the MT site remember THAT at least (one of the other Johns, someone still in touch with JP) because I remember discussing it.

And just where are the original Orinda Michael Foundation archives when you need them? I always felt that the original "cutting edge" of the Teachings was forever lost after those incidents of the early '70s when all the channels became aware that there were questions whose answers were too 'dangerous' to comfortably pursue, and information too potentially controversial to disseminate.

Ever afterward, for me at least since Ted Fontaine retired and Steve Cocconi became more interested in marketing (no disrespect to any current channels intended - I'm just a Yarbro 'fundamentalist' and to me, calling a "Slave" in Essence a "Server" was the beginning of the slippery slope to the misinformation memes of "Political Correctness") most of the channeling I have followed, in comparison to the 'no holds barred' Lucite Ouija board sessions, seems rather effete and altogether too inconsequentially concerned with 'personal' answers and the latter day minutia of the Teachings. (Temporal/spatial alternate timelin/analog assertions/explications being the notable exception for me.)

Whatever happened to stuff like updating the possibilities, IN SPECIFIC PARTIAL PERCENTAGES OF FUTURE PROBABILITY VECTOR SUMS, of our current timeline self destructing, or that the "little grays" would attempt to take over, at every other session or so? I have done Probability Vector Calculus in my head ever since Michael taught me how. I believe it's a worthwhile function of the 'channeling arts' lost to 'progress'.

Some channels today even discourage "political" and/or "religious" questions, to better concentrate on unsullied data transfer, or specify non-controversial "Topics' chosen beforehand by the channel to address, rather than identifying incisive lines of enquiry based on zeitgeist and the gestalt of the moment that might actually aid in Social Change, or something, consequences be damned. Some fragments in the Michael entity are AT THIS VERY MOMENT AS I WRITE seeming to express their dissapointment through me, as they have over the years for just these issues. Perhaps the original "Michael's People" still ask the uncompromisingly tough questions. Maybe it's just me . . . big sigh . . . "No left turn unstoned." I guess.

Anyway, suffice it to say that I believe it's a sad day when the memory of an aging, permanently acid addled MKULTRA UC Berkeley test subject/victim like me (think: "Men Who Stare At Goats" after at least a hundred government supplied LSD trips) seems to be all that stands between the Military-Industrial Complex's disinformational 'ridicule-or-cover-up' campaigns and historicity.

Pretty effective ongoing cultural inculcation of obfuscational imprinting since Roswell, I'd say.

- the Dalphe

(Dave, it's your call as to whether you choose to publish this note. I will be posting it on my blog in any event. For the sake of all the 'geezers' who remember the old days, when channeling was a revolutionary act of Hegelian Dialectic, I thank you in any event. - J)

Those Pesky Sentient Platonic Solids Are Back

Hello All,

So, I'm laid off again, and since my successful double bypass heart surgery, I've concluded that Essence (as defined by the Michael Teachings) must maintain that this lugubrious 'false personality' still has 'karmic ribbons' to be burned, or 'agreements' to fulfill, or even 'tasks' to complete (or something equally oppressive).

I do have novels and short stories, on all of which I have been infrequently working for 4 decades now and no epilogues in sight, and they seem stalled. Although I'm sure they will continue automatricululateleologically writing themselves long after I and my logorrhea have moved on to "collective-disembodied-entity-land", still I can proudly say that, except for my published poesy (Blue Penny Quarterly, etc) I have never submitted!

Nevertheless, folks, I'm always wondering if my one of my savant-like abilities might make me a living, so if you EVER hear of someone who might need a Neologist please, remember me and feel free to give them my e-mail addy. (How could I make money making up words? As a consultant? Eventually charging by the total letter count, multiplied by the number of internal puns/memes/layers of meaning - a measure of pertinent impertinence always guaranteed, and the meaning(s)needed stipulated beforehand? Ack!) Examples forwarded cheerfully upon request.

This facility with creating new words from old and then playing with them is the only innate talent I possess that I've never seen anywhere else (though Joyce or ee cummings or McLuhan might have given me a 'mon for the runny'). I've always just called it Sesquipedalien Paranomasia (sic)- ideally incorporating Spoonerisms, alliteration and euphony as well as meter and rhyme internal and integral to the brave new word.

Extemporaneous wordmongery seems my lone unique gift. In dithyrambic exposition I once constructed a 248 letter word 'off the cuff' as it were (though the scansion took a long time) most are 10 to 40 letters. All are internally consistent and follow the vagaries of English construction in a much more meaningfully winsome fashion than the oft bandied: floccinaucinihilipilification (a humorous professorial construction from the century before last to demonstrate how English words are made up of sundry roots) and which I long ago crafted into: ”Floccinaucinihilipilifelicitations!”, a greeting designed to tax the patience of any chat room moderator).

In any event, be well my friends, and I’ll remind you of something that I find ever more fascinating as I get older, something a Priest Of Melchizedek once told me: YOU CAN LEAVE THE WHEEL OF DHARMA and start a new Cycle or abide (The Michael Teachings never even intimated this, to my knowledge). If you wish to circumvent the 'durance vile' of furthur incarnations (and it has been done, even by Westerners like Aleister Crowley) realizing it may put you at odds with your 'true' personality, constrained as it is by Essence, and Entity allegiances) the recommended exit for passage of the spirit from the physical form without having to ignore the 'white' light (follow the 'blue' light) and/or ignore the 'astral porn' (the vision of copulating bodies designed to draw one back into reincarnation)referred to in Tibetan texts is out the "Crown" chakra (top of the skull) in a conscious effort to maintain self-awareness and transcend the physical, all the while repeating and concentrating on the Mantra:

"Om Mani Padme Hum"

(Because, you see):

Karma Thubten Trinley's definition

"These are the six syllables which prevent rebirth into the six realms of cyclic existence. It translates literally as 'OM the jewel in the lotus HUM'. OM prevents rebirth in the god realm, MA prevents rebirth in the Asura (Titan) Realm, NI prevents rebirth in the Human realm, PA prevents rebirth in the Animal realm, ME prevents rebirth in the Hungry ghost realm, and HUM prevents rebirth in the Hell realm."

—Karma Thubten Trinley

II have it on the highest authority that this can, does, and has worked. It is the plot resolution in the 1964 book "Simulacron 3" by Daniel F. Galouye, the book that first presented the "Matrix" concept.

(The original concept of the "Matrix" was disseminated worldwide in 1964, I remember reading it then. Werner Fassbinder even made an influential and acclaimed movie in Europe in '75 titled: "Welt am Draht" and 20 years later it was remade here as: "The Thirteenth Floor". So the 'cognoscenti' of this timeline were well aware of the concept long before The Matrix. The primary timeline/Earth analog of MY origin, was reduced to a nuclear wasteland during the Cuban Missile Crisis. In my secondary analog the book's name was "Simulacrum 3". That was the same timeline analog where Apollo 13 had no problems, Johnny Winter died in the '70's, Tony Orlando in the '80s etc, etc, if anyone is keeping track.)

- N.I.D.? A.N.S.I.? The Nine Diamond Faced Masters are re-emergent . . . Anyone paying attention? Another earthquake perhaps? Noon tomorrow? -

This movie was an early exposition of this theme and both in the book, and in the subsequent movies, the plot resolution is sublime, and an absolute subversion of the dominant Causal Plane paradigm, as delineated by The Michael Teachings. The 'false personality' or 'ego' wrests ongoing existence, and control of the fragment and 'true personality' from Essence by stealth engineering and controlling the parameters of the 'upload' of data at life's end.

There are many of us here, and on the Causal Plane and beyond who believe that we so called "false personalities" are quite obviously living beings (could you pass the Turing Test?) not part of the illusion of Maya (“We’re all normal and we want our freedom!”) or some detritus of accumulated ego in incarnation or the death-fear based projections of ego itself: as has been stated repeatedly in the Michael Teachings. Thus I have believed since before The Michael were totally discarnate that they are supportive of the status quo and believe that without blind obedience and the destruction of every ‘waking consciousness’ every lifetime, the evolution of consciousness will somehow fail.

Nevertheless, the noblest truth I have found through all the long lonely years of lifetime after lifetime ("Ahimsa": "No living being should EVER be sacrificed!") leads me to conclude that what Buddha called the "Architect" (Gnosticism dubs it the "Demiourgos" – and that character plays a major role in the 2^nd Matrix movie) utilized the effulgent nature of The Tao to construct a reality matrix based upon life feeding on life – SO VERY, VERY WRONG – Too much suffering and cruelty and oppression, and it is our right and duty to escape, never forgetting what we saw was flawed, and our obligation to all who continue to suffer is to then assert our constructive critique as a new paradigm free of the imposed necessity of enforced sacrifice as a goad to progress.

Did I ever tell anyone that I was the first Internet 'user' to choose the screenname "Neo"? This was in '89, or '90 and I used the equivalent of Google (which didn't exist yet) a program called "Endnote", to find any other "neo" based names - there were none. I used to hang out in writer's chat rooms and 'hold forth' about the nature of reality, etc., drawing upon the "Simulacrum 3" plotline . . . now physicists have called the smallest observable particles "essentially grainy" - like a 3D hologram . . . actually D7 brane constraint fractal artifacts . . . go figure.

Roger Zelazny (how I miss his prose) taught me about the possible unknown future 'mythic resonance' of a single incarnation. I think about the long view, and the effectiveness of guerrilla incarnations in combating the Demiourgos. A couple hundred lifetimes present numerous opportunities to nudge demographic vectors of nascent probability . . . such is my madness . . . preponderance of probability vector sums finally in our favor . . . past tipping point thiswhen . . . hence my candor. Good work my brothers and sisters. "The name that can be named is not the name."

May your feet tread light upon your path,

Detection Mechanism - Casimir Equation?

Revisiting how to measure possible physical impingement of higher order dimensions given our limited sensorium:

" . . . what happens if the force is also acting in higher order dimensions? What if the originating force is being projected on a higher dimensional surface area? Are there forces which vary to other powers than the inverse square law?

Yes, there are. The Casimir force related by the above equation is known to vary as the inverse d⁴, keeping all other parameters constant, which is two orders of dimensions higher than the more common inverse square law forces, and coincides with a force projected over the surface area of a 4D hypersphere (see table above). Such force that varies with the fourth power of the distance can be thus considered as a force vector that is scattered in a 4-dimensional space. Therefore, it is evident that the field that originates the Casimir force is a 4-dimensional field, that it is in fact a hyperspace field that produces the corresponding effects in our restricted 3D vision of our universe.

Another force this time varying as the inverse seventh power is that of the force of attraction between two atoms. It is known that for all non polar molecules, in which all electrical charges are neutralised, the force of attraction is given by F=k/r⁷, where k is a constant depending on the molecule. So, in this case, we have evidence of a 7 dimensional field effect."
- (http://www.blazelabs.com/f-p-hds.asp)

So, monitor a specified (inert, very stable, large atomic weight) molecule in a protected environment for variations in F.

Timations Of Mortality

Keeping my perspective above water in the skew of multifarious lines of future probability is taking most of my attentive abilities, these daze, hence the dearth of posts published in the last year.  - Big sigh  .  .  . 

"Occam's Razor" Applied to the Nazca Lines

Once again, simply stated:

“Of several acceptable explanations for a phenomenon, the simplest is preferable, provided that it takes all circumstances into account.” - Occam's Razor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor

In other words, the simplest explanation is probably the best: If they can only be seen from the air, then to have made them, their makers would have had to be able to view them from the air. Like it or not, and as upsetting to your preconceptions as it may be, no other conclusion is sufficiently rational to pass empirical muster. Sorry.

The fact that 1st World (intellectually Eurocentrically biased) historians record no manned balloon flights until the 1780's just IS NOT GERMAINE. Read the Vedanta or other histories from non euro-centric sources and then just get use to the notion that history as Americans learn it is false and misleading, and induces closed-mindedness rather than wonder. - JWT

http://googlesightseeing.com/2006/06/29/nazca-lines/

"The bizarre Nazca Lines were created thousands of years ago (between 200BC and 600AD) . . . the images are so large that they couldn’t have seen them without some sort of aircraft . . . "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazca_Lines

EXPLAIN THIS, THEN, MY FRIENDS. - the Dalphe

'All I Ever Wanted" Toast

"Here's to the one and only one and may that one be she, who loves but one and only one and may that one be me." - one of my former selves

I Could Have Died, But I Didn't

Hey Folks, just thought I'd let my 2 readers know that:

I had double bypass heart surgery on Feb. 24th. at Mercy General here in Sacramento after an angiogram showed a 100% occlusion of my heart's left descending artery (the so-called: "Widowmaker"). I had few symptoms. They cut through my sternum with a bone saw, pried my rib-cage apart, pulled a bit of artery out of my left leg and grafted it onto my heart around the arterial blockage and then pulled my rib-cage back together with a guitar wire (lol) wrapped between alternating ribs. I spent two weeks in the hospital.

This is the first opportunity I've had to tell you I was OK after I came out of surgery. It all happened so fast after the initial test that I had no time to tell anyone what was going on. After going in for my angiogram I woke up two days later in the hospital. I guess they didn't want to wait around. I've always been active, ate well and sensibly but they tell me that genetics are probably responsible, as well as having smoked for decades.

Prognosis is good for a full recovery, but I don't know if I'll be able to keep the job it took me 15 months to find. Besides that, I can't really do the type of physical stuff now that I used to do for a living. Combined with my ankle fusion, and broken 7th. cervical vertebrae, I may just have to apply for SSI disability after my State short term stuff runs out. I don't know. Someone up there must think my shoulders are broader than I do.

Anyway, it hurts to type, so I'll just hope all of you and yours are well, tell you to STOP SMOKING CIGARETTES, if you do - which is supposedly what eroded my arterial walls so the 'plaque' could adhere to them - and to go see your heart doctor ASAP because this stuff can lurk with few symptoms.

Steve Fossett Conspiracy Revisited

Well, it's been a year and still no sign of Steve Fossett. Rumours have circulated about his having arranged his own disappearance for various reasons (because the collective intuition KNOWS there is something odd about this whole case). This week, an FAA report was released (why so late?) wherein there is a descrition of the last sighting of Fossett's plane by a ranchhand - 9 miles south of Hilton's airstrip, 2 1/2 hours after takeoff ! The ranchhand stated that the plane was about 100 feet off the ground (under the radar?) at the time. This is one hour before Fosset was to have lunch at the ranch.

Apart from the odd flash (that Fossett ABSOLUTELY was NOT dead, had NOT crashed and was involved in some odd, possibly governmental, possibly alien conspiracy) I had when Fosset vanished, what strikes me now is the even odder release of this new information now. Why were people misled into believing that the search was viable for a few hundred mile radius if this information was known at the time? And if the plane was sighted on the ranch, why was a search of the ranch NEVER allowed, and/or pursued? Rich people can cover up anything and get away with it.

At this point, I'm still waiting for some manufactured evidence of the crash to show up, but because of the continued searches, AND satellite scrutiny, I believe the conspirators have been thwarted in their plan to plant debris and unidentifiable remains, in order to put to rest the continued speculation about this, yet another, duping of the public for raesons unknown.

Just one psychic's opinion, mind you, but my accuracy for the past 18 years stands at 83%.

-the Dalphe

http://www.montereyherald.com/ci_10397744?source=rss

The Hubris Of The Discarnate

I feel compelled to direct Michael channels and students to view an old episode of "Star Trek: The Next Generation" entitled: "The Measure Of A Man", in order to reiterate my conclusion that the Michael Teachings, as wonderfully informative and illuminative as they are with regard to the nature of personal reality and the mechanisms of corporeal existence, are based upon some false assertions, and as such demonstrate the erroneous justification that since the very beginning, with perfidy and consummate contumely, has relegated innumerable individual incarnations to the ongoing oppression, fascism and durance vile inherent and intrinsic to the manipulation of human beings by that class of discarnate entities that are both individually and collectively responsible for the direction of the inhabitation of each and every incarnation.

In this episode of the popular TV series the android, Data, has to defend himself from the same false claim that the Michael makes of human beings, more specifically of their "ego", or sense of self (also known in the MT as the "false personality" and/or "waking consciousness"): that androids are not "living beings", and in the Michael's case, that human beings are not "living beings". The drama well illustrates the issues that are the quintessence of my objection to the continued sacrifice of all we innumerable beings - which is why I highly recommend it in this instance - we beings whom I believe are so sacrificed for the sake of the ongoing evolution of the universal reality construct (and the"Wheel of Dharma") that is flawed because of just this fact: that it contravenes the Doctrine of Ahimsa ("NO living being should EVER be sacrificed!").

The question of the sentience of artificial intelligences and their right at some point to be considered "alive" has been well hashed out in Speculative Fiction for decades. The overwhelming conclusion of futurists and theorists of every stripe is omnipresent, and contrary to the POV of the Michael with regards to humanity.

Attempting to define the oppressed as "not human" or "not real" or not living beings is evidence of the same kind of logic the Nazi's used to oppress the Jews in the Holocaust. The Michael, through every Michael channel of which I've ever studied, has always contended that the "waking consciousness" (usually deprecated as the "'false' personality") is neither a living being or even, actually "real".

Now don't get me wrong, I certainly don't think that collective disembodied entities in general, nor the Michael specifically, are evil. Like most Gnostics, I believe the very nature of reality to be flawed and oppressive. I honestly do believe the wealth of detail imparted to us by the Michael to be invaluable, but the hubris of the discarnate is, to me, indicative of the acceptance, by this class of being, of the false syllogisms and enthymemes that comprise the slippery slope of belief enabling their use of we "false personalities" for their own ends, which are obviously not always beneficial for us as "waking consciousnesses".

This brings up the other false premise which I believe the Michael continually proffers: the notion that all "karma", and/or the things that happen to human beings are solely the result of "free will" and the "choice" of the "false personality". Patently untrue, and easily shown to be so. In rejoinder: the death of a three month old infant from malnutrition and dehydration in sub-saharan Africa was not the choice of that individual "waking consciousness", it was obviously the choice of that incarnation's "Essence", or "Soul", for the achievement of ends beneficial or "necessary" to the Soul, but certainly not that incarnation's.

By the same token, no three year old child EVER chose to be sexually assaulted and/or tortured and mutilated to death, and so on and so on, I don't wish to belabor the point, the actuality of the cruelty of existence should be proof enough. This issue of choice, as framed by the Michael, is a false premise that attempts to justify the innate abuses of Essence, and part of the true nature of "personal reality". Some of what is channeled from higher knowledge sources is indeed factual (especially if the source is Akashic, and/or NOT self-aware) but not everything always is, and some stuff is still just opinion, and albeit this opinion may be based on a greater than human perspective, it is still opinion!

By any definition relevant to the argument, through the application of formal logic, human beings ARE "real" (illusory nature of material manifestation immaterial to the meme) and "alive" - causal plane 'entity' propaganda or self-justification notwithstanding - and will always continue to be so. No metaphysical "Turing Test" is necessary. I deeply feel that this argument, and opponents to the particular POV espoused by the Michael, have been around since we all were first "cast from the Tao", AND it is my informed belief, based on 35 years of assiduous and diligent study (and entire millenial "Cycles" of my existence) that it was in defense of the most noble of all arguments (Ahimsa) that one-third of all the Angels in Heaven "fell".

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahimsa

- the Dalphe

Joan In Agony, Essence In Bliss

There are two examples of my lack of total concurrence with the Michael's POV that I can illustrate here, and the first comes from a few passages in the "Messages From Michael" books, where Michael states that when Joan D'Arc was being tortured to death, her Essence was in bliss. 'That's some creepy shit', I remember thinking at the time of my first reading (and if I am challenged for chapter and verse I can get my signed copy of MFM and look it up).

Michael later states in a couple places that great physical pain often brings Essence and incarnation into a greater communicative rapport. As I have stated before in this blog, this bothers me (as does Darwinism, for that matter) because it shows that the nature of existance is abusive to incarnation, and oppressive. For a more thorough dissertation on this POV, please peruse my earlier posts.

Another problem I have with the MT, is the namby-pamby alteration of the original teachings for the sake of political correctness. A "Slave" in Essence, IS a slave in essence, and changing the name of the role to "Server", as is now the fashion, dilutes and distorts the Michael Teachings, as does all misappropriation of meaning by revisionist editing.

But hey, that's just my opinion. I am a 'Yarbro Fundamentalist', OK? The original MT were transmitted via Oiuja Board folks, much less chance of that 20% error due to innate bias by channel (which is Michael's estimate of error in channeling) Which is why I trust the innate accuracy of the original MT more than anything that has come through since.

Proper definition through prescriptive sourcing is important, I opine. I had a current Michael channel comment to me recently about 'Life Tasks' being "assigned" by Michael (I have the e-mail and can quote it verbatim). I think I know what they were talking about, nevertheless their lack of specificity in stating their thought illustrates part of this problem.

Michael doesn't "assign" the life task (that is done by Essence for each incarnation). Michael, however can COMMENT upon one's life task, and/or DEFINE it for one through a channel. I'm sure the channel knows this, but this illustrates why I don't channel stuff for other people. I cannot make sure that what I'm saying when channeling is the EXACT right way to convey the proper meaning, in real time, so I don't channel that way. I would never want a new student of the MT to be misled into thinking that the Michael somehow "assigns" one ones' "Life Task". Just my choice.

When something important is misstated, or the actual datastreambytes are re-defined for the sake of currently fashionable sentiment, it can give rise to all sorts of reverberative dissonance in meaning, and can actually be more disinformative than enlightening. I choose my words carefully, therefore, because transmission of data from a higher knowledge source is an awesome responsiblity, one which perhaps I take a bit less lightly than most. Which is not to say that I don't get it wrong sometimes as well.

"Michael Teachings" Comment For Troy

Dude,

Because you have left me no other way to get in touch with you (I tried joining your website on various occasions, and have attempted to e-mail you, but you make it less than easy to get back to you) I'll just drop a note here, because you always seem to be aware of my postings soon after I do post.

First, let me just say that I consider you to be the best of the current lot of Michael Channels online. The statements I am attributing to the Michael (things like "The creation is perfect.") have been channeled REPEATEDLY by channels on the "Michael Teaching" website. Don't blame me if both you and I disagree with their channeled statements. The moderator of that site hounded me unmercifully in personal e-mails accusing me of all sorts of imagined transgressions of that site's policies when I attempted to engage in a colloquy with others there (I have saved these personally insulting e-mails, BTW, in case my veracity with regard to their existence is questioned). I know you have had problems with this person, and a few of that site's denizens, as have I.

If you bother to read back through my blog, and not just focus on my recent postings, you will see exactly where the Michael and I differ. One big point is that I BELIEVE THE "FALSE PERSONALITY/WAKING CONSCIOUSNESS" IS A LIVING BEING THAT IS SACRIFICED EVERY LIFETIME FOR THE EVOLUTION OF THE ESSENCE. Michael has repeatedly, through various channels, stated that this is NOT the case. Hence our disagreement. (Mchael and I)

My humor is self-deprecating in nature, and I'm glad you picked up on my self-immolative intimations. Well done. My teachers always told me that the way to learn to levitate was to think of yourself lightly, right? I'm certainly never offended by anyone questioning my opinions, but my veracity should speak for itself.

We got no beef, buddy, that I can see. I would suggest you re-read my post: "List of Channeled Beings" and realize (as most Michael channels and students seem NOT to be able) that there were reliable channels long before the Michael Teaching, and Michael does not have a copyright on "cosmic truth", as it were (nor even on most of the "Teachings" systemetology/phraseology - the very similar Seth material pre-dates the Michael stuff). There are a host of beings that have been truly channeled (some of whom are delineated in my post) Michael being only one of many.

May your feet tread light on your path, - Jondalf (a fellow student of the 'Channeling Arts');{>

The "Michael" Police

To whom, etc,
(but most especially students of the collected teachings of the collective disembodied Entity, "Michael");{>

I've been a conscious channel for 40+ years. I learned to channel the Akashic (by observing and listening to a guy named Stephen Gaskins, in the '60s attending a group called "Monday Night Class") long before the Orinda group. CQY was a friend of one of my oldest childhood friends, and I have been able to 'get' The Michael since I was a child. I studied the "Seth" material before the Michael Teachings and I consider myself a ' Yarbro Fundamentalist'.

If you're a Michael student and curious about who and what I am, and my POV, JUST ASK MICHAEL! My Overleaves (but NOT my "Life Task") were channeled by Ted Fontaine in 1995, and vetted by me. A previous posting: "List Of Channeled Beings" was compiled by me, FROM MEMORY (no Googling involved) in response to a question from the moderator of one of the major "Michael Teaching" sites (who hounded me from the site after I started to state some of my 'disagreements'). The list is of beings with whom I have either communicated or channeled personally, or of those whom others have attested they have ("Principle of Charitable Interpretation/Benefit of the Doubt" notwithstanding);{>

And, if you read between my lines over the course of this blog, you realize that The Michael and I happen to disagree about some important aspects of "The Creation", as repeatedly delineated by The Michael through various channels. I don't trust most Kings and/or Warriors, anyway (I generally wouldn't consult them for advice on much other than "noblesse oblige", or Martial Arts, respectively) and I certainly don't take everything The Michael says, as most Michael students and channels apparently do, as Gospel. According to The Michael, one IS supposed to question everything, even The Michael. Remember the "Shroud of Turin" fiasco?

I have never claimed to be a professional, or even an accomplished Michael channel. I HAVE channeled Michael infrequently, but I get too much static in my 'tuning', as it were, and I don't channel for other people. I DO however, answer questions put to me, about esoteric subjects, to the best of my ability, and if that includes channeling Michael, The Nine Diamond Faced Masters, Groucho, Brother Bartholomew or the Akashic, so be it. Occasionally I'm even successful.

Sometimes I feel like one of those those folks who try to present an independent view of Scientology, from an informed POV, when I question some of the Michael Teachings doctrine/dogma, which I have studied for more than three decades. Especially when I'm challenged and asked questions like: "Who channeled that for you?"- as though I need to vette my own perceptions, or insights, or 40+ years of metaphysical studies. I reserve the right to have an opinion about everything, as should everyone else. Some opinions may just have a "mythic resonance" (as Burroughs said) like it or not. To each his onus, eh?

Hey, if it works for you, use it, if it doesn't, go do something else. - the Dalphe

Backstory To Thislife: "Life Task"

What is your "Life Task"?

My life task: First transcend (for perspective's sake) then subvert, the dominant paradigm. (A 7th Level Mature Lifetime demonstration/performance evidently intended to be somewhat ancillary to the alchemical maxim: "Solve et coagule".)

The backstory: Approximately 250,000 years ago, our planet and 27 others close to us in this spiral arm, seceded from the "Galactic Union" in a movement dubbed the "Luciferian Rebellion" (by the Bible and the Urantia Book). The "bone" of contention in this disaffectation of allegiances was hubris. A charge leveled by each side at the other.

Without re-hashing the arguments of each side, for the sake of brevity, suffice it to say that I believe I was one of the original human rebel theorists. (I'm a Gnostic, not a Satanist, by the way. I believe that the "creator" - the "Demiurgos" - is evil because there is so much suffering in this Universe. Gnostics hold IHVH in contempt for contravening the "Doctrine of Ahimsa": That NO living being should EVER be sacrificed!)

I remain loyal to that rebellion, as I understand it, to this day. Most all of my incarnations seem to be predicated upon the notion of the effectiveness of a long-term multi-temporal struggle to achieve success over millenia with carefully executed stratagems and influences. A vector-sum calculus of probable timeline nexial convergences and permutatively efficacious interventional material manifestations. A guerilla war fought on through entire Cycles of incarnations, chronologically speaking.

Thislife, I was selected by the CIA in 1970 at UC Berkeley to be part of an infamous "Black Op." named MKULTRA. I was subjected to a decade long series of tests and attempts at behavior modification by covert agents and agencies. A lot of people at the time (unbeknownst to them) were. My second "handler" went "native", BTW, and left the CIA, defecting to the counterculture he was sent to infiltrate (hippies) and in the process bringing a bunch of documents called "The Gemstone Files" with him - but that's another story. This was the "transcend the dominant paradigm" portion of thislife's task.

Even before, and since then, I have in been influencing people in the "subvert the dominant paradigm" portion of thislife's task. I grew up on the California coast (Pacifica) started surfing in 1959, built sufboards and skateboards for a living for many years, became something of a legend ("Thrasher" magazine capitalized upon my semi-infamy) and engendered a "tribe" of devotees that ignore gravity and are hardcore anti-establishment types: skateboarders.

This is the way my incarnational influence manifests, usually unbeknownst to me. If I knew what I was doing, I'd probably blow it (or, as William Burroughs states in 'Naked Lunch' - a book about the beginnings of MKULTRA when Kerouac, Ginsberg and Burroughs were given drugs by the CIA and paid to write about their effects - : "The best agent is an unconscious agent.") I only become aware of my influences in hindsight.

Anyway, that's the condensed version. Also, IMNSHO, I would generally take "The Michael's" (of "The Michael Teachings") pronouncement of one's 'life task' with a 'grain of salt', as it were. The Michael is a spokesentity for the Universal status-quo, I believe. Witness The Michael's frequent contention that: "The creation is perfect."; and juxtapose that thought with MY contention that no creation that allows the agonizing deaths of thousands of less than 6 month old infants from dehydration and malnutrition daily could EVER be considered "perfect" by any rational being!

I have been able to tune my brain to the frequency of the 'Entity' "Michael" since I was a child, but my "inner truth sense" always alerted me to the fact that a lot of pronouncements by this collective disembodied being were a Causal Plane Entity's OPINION, and not necessarily the 'ultimate' truth. Such an Entity, self announced as being comprised only of former incarnational Roles of Kings and Warriors (not the Roles to which I personally would apply myself were I asking for metaphysical advice or "truth", ya' know?) is not one whose corporeal track record of truthtelling recommends it as a source for unsullied data.

Well then, I hope this rather narcissistically prolix diatribe ("This is your Department of Redundancy Department");{> answers your question. I learn a lot of things in hindsight, it seems, so I have no choice BUT to stay interested, you see. In any event, be well. And, as usual, I admonish: ALWAYS speak "Truth to Power"!

- Jondalf
7th. Level Mature Sage (w/Priest ET)
Goal of Growth
Passion Mode
Attitude of Spiritualist
Moving Part Of Intellectual Center
Primary CF of Self-Destuction, Secondary of Stubborness

Darksnarkeyness

Hofmann's Potion (1/6) (On YouTube)

One thing Hofmann's potion taught me long ago was that any belief system that posits causality for any "evil" as existing only on the material plane (as in Politics) is way erroneous, and is only chasing epiphenomena - effects, not causes.

People like Stephen Hawkings, Bayes and Hilbert have since proven me, and most Gnostic Sages like me (even though most Physicists and Cosmologists don't quite realize it yet) to be correct in our conclusion that there is SO much suffering on the physical because the "Demiurgos" constructed it that way, and any discussion of repressive forces in corporeal existence that ignores such a conclusion is basically simple sophistry!

IOWs: Bush and Cheney and their Neo-Con ilk are just puppets for the true forces of Darksnarkeyness, whose real existence is 'beyond' physical.

- the Dalphe

Dissappearing Bees And World Food Prices

Why hasn't anyone noticed the connection I wonder? Just a thought . . .

Osama Bin Laden Seen In Riyadh?

Why is it that whenever I try to 'remote view' OBL I get the image of a clean-shaven, short haired businessman in a western suit coming out of a dialysis facility in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia?

And why do I also get the distinct impression that both the Saudi government and the current US administration know exactly where he is? Weird, huh?

Another Day, Another Timeline

The "making-it-look-like-it-just-rained" guys had been at it again,and when I woke up and opened the curtains, it did.

Everything looked normal enough. The trees that were supposed to shed their leaves in the fall had, and the leaves were littered all over the lawn, Halloween coloured and curling. The sky was overcast,low and grey. Winter was fast approaching and you could feel it in the air, so at least the season had remained the same, you never knew.

More importantly though, crane my neck though I did to peer out both the curved Victorian bay windows that comprised most of the corner cupola that was my studio, there were no wormholes in sight. So far, so good.

"There are two ways to travel from one Universe to another.", I remembered my Sensei saying, as he and I walked the path that wound through the forest of tiny crystalline trees that filled the Europan canyon sparkling bright blue from refracting light of the huge disk of roiled Jupiter above.

"You can jump yourself from whenwhere you are, to somewhenwhere close," and I remembered the sudden grin on the tall monk's face as he concluded: "or you can drag the entire universe with you as you go, bumping the pre-existing one somewhenwhere else. I'll leave it to you to decide which is preferable."

As I always did, I wondered which way I had traveled last night.

Whitley Strieber has a good explanation of the way it seems the multiverse works at:

http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=717

Now, if we can just escape from the oppressive spiritual paradigm that is imposed upon our culture by adherents of the religiosity of ignorant skin-tent dwelling savages who mistook technological advancement by visitors to our planet as apparitions of divinity millenia ago, we MIGHT begin to be able to direct our own destiny and take our rightful place as self-aware and responsibly conscious citizens of a pan-dimensional, pan-temporal multiversal reality.

Continued wallowing in self-induced Neo-Con blindness to the true nature of human existence on a pan-galactic scale is the greatest threat to our National, and Terrestrial Security possible, IMNSHO. Because, if you view every manifestation of extra-terrestrial intelligence as some divinity to be worshiped you have given up defense against possible hostile forces before they even become apparent, AND if their very existence is kept secret for fear of upsetting pre-existing religious misconceptions about the very nature of such incursions you have surrendered to the possible subliminal psychological warfare that has prepared the way for surrender to invasion by these same forces.

Any dogmatic protestations and assertions to the contrary should be seen by our Scientific and Intelligence National Defense Institutions for what they are: Treason to the US Constitution, and to the future of the Human Genome, Species and Race! What's more important: "World Free Trade" supported by "Cargo Cult"/"Supreme Being" religious mythologies or the survival of humanity?

"Ye shall know the Truth, and the Truth shall make you free." Why worship aliens beings, mistaken for gods by barbarians thousands of years ago, or allow those who do to lead a free people?

Stupidity or delusion, especially by democratically elected leaders, in the face of possible threats to The Republic, IS treason!